ddos-simulation.com
All 140 Techniques Explore full Layer 3–7 attack library Network & Transport SYN flood, UDP flood, ICMP, TCP states Application & Protocols HTTP/2 Rapid Reset, Slowloris, QUIC, TLS API Gateway Resilience Kong, APISIX, Spring Cloud, Tyk, KrakenD
Compliance & Audits EU DORA Compliance Regulation 2022/2554 & TLPT stress testing NIS2 Directive Cyber resilience for essential entities PCI DSS v4.0 Testing Req 11.4 & 6.4 payment perimeter defense
Cloud & Programs AWS DDoS Testing Shield Advanced, CloudFront & ALB Azure DDoS Testing Network Protection & Front Door WAF Google Cloud Armor Adaptive Protection & Cloud CDN Cloudflare Testing WAF, rate limits & Magic Transit Periodic Testing Quarterly & continuous resilience drills White-Label Program Deliver testing under your own brand
Controlled Testing Process War room, stepped ramp-up & safety How auto-abort works 50ms health sampling & instant safety Regional Distribution Multi-region origins: Anycast, GeoDNS & PoPs Testing Legality & RoE Rules of Engagement & authorizations
White-Label Program
Sign in Build a test plan
Sign in
Simulations All 140 Techniques Network & Transport (L3/L4) Application & Protocols (L7) API Gateways
Solutions & Compliance EU DORA Compliance NIS2 Directive PCI DSS v4.0 Testing AWS DDoS Testing Guide Azure DDoS Testing Guide Google Cloud Armor Guide Cloudflare Testing Guide Periodic Testing Program White-Label Program
Methodology & Safety Controlled Testing Process Sub-Second Auto-Abort Regional Distribution Testing Legality & RoE
Platform Timeline Builder Live Monitoring
Home › DDoS simulation testing › TCP flag flood test

Layer 4 · Transport · tcp_flag_flood

TCP flag flood test

The tcp_flag_flood simulation rotates crafted TCP control flags — SYN, ACK, RST, and FIN — packet-to-packet against a target you own, stressing stateful firewalls and connection-tracking tables with rapid flag changes and evading mitigation that keys on a single flag. It is the mixed-rotation complement to the isolated single-flag floods. It runs from the worker's own address at a bounded rate, and is reviewed and approved before it runs.

Layer L4 Protocol TCP Command tcp_flag_flood Access Reviewed engagement

On this page

  1. What a TCP flag flood does
  2. How ddos-simulation.com simulates it safely
  3. What the test exercises
  4. When to run it
  5. How to run the test
  6. Reading the results
  7. Availability & limits
  8. FAQ
  9. Related simulations

What a TCP flag flood does

A TCP flag flood sends a high rate of TCP segments carrying specific control flags — SYN, ACK, RST, FIN, or unusual combinations — that a target must inspect and classify. Stateful firewalls and connection-tracking tables spend work deciding whether each segment belongs to a known flow, and out-of-state control packets (a bare ACK or RST with no matching connection) can force extra lookups or table churn. At volume, that classification cost, rather than raw bandwidth, is what pressures the service.

Rotating the flag on every packet — rather than sending one flag steadily — is what distinguishes this technique: it stresses how a stateful device copes with constant flag changes and evades mitigation signatures that match a single flag. For a clean, isolated measurement of one vector, ddos-simulation.com also offers the single-flag floods individually — the ACK flood, plus dedicated RST and FIN floods, each sending one steady, named flag so a result maps to exactly one failure mode.

How ddos-simulation.com simulates it safely

ddos-simulation.com emits TCP control segments toward a single verified domain, pinned to a public address, from the worker's own source address — the flags are crafted, but the source is never forged. The packet rate stays inside the limits set for that domain, health checks watch the target throughout, and the run aborts itself the moment a threshold you set is crossed.

Authorized targets only

Every run is bound to one verified domain you have proven you own. Ownership is checked over HTTPS before anything is scheduled, and running traffic against systems you do not own or are not clearly authorized to test may be unlawful. See the Acceptable Use Policy.

What the test exercises

  • Stateful firewall and connection-tracking (conntrack) classification cost
  • Evasion of mitigation signatures that key on a single flag
  • Handling of out-of-state control packets (bare ACK, RST, FIN)
  • TCP stack and CPU headroom under control-flag pressure
  • Rate limiting and anti-flood policy on network middleboxes
  • Time-to-degrade and recovery once the flood stops

When to run a TCP flag flood test

Run a TCP flag flood test when stateful middleboxes — firewalls, NAT, connection trackers — are the thing you need to stress.

  • You want to see how stateful firewalls and connection-tracking tables handle out-of-state SYN, ACK, RST, and FIN segments.
  • A NAT or load balancer keeps per-flow state and you need to confirm it doesn't exhaust under crafted control traffic.
  • You're validating that anomaly-based mitigation flags and drops malformed or out-of-state segments.

How to run a TCP flag flood test

  1. Verify your domain. Prove ownership over HTTPS — it is self-service and takes minutes.
  2. Add the tcp_flag_flood command to a timeline in the portal and set the target port, flag mix, rate, and duration.
  3. Set health thresholds. Choose the error-rate, latency, or status-code limits at which the test should abort itself.
  4. Run and watch. Bounded workers are provisioned minutes before start and torn down the moment the last task ends, while metrics stream live.
  5. Read the results. Review the recorded latency, reachability, and worker timeline to find where your service starts to bend.

Configure a TCP flag flood test in the portal →

Reading the results

Resilient: Out-of-state segments are dropped cheaply, connection-tracking stays within capacity, and legitimate sessions are untouched.

Under strain: The conntrack or firewall state table fills, CPU climbs handling control segments, or legitimate connections are evicted to make room.

Availability & limits

The TCP flag flood is a higher-impact network-layer technique, so it is reviewed and approved before it runs — beyond verifying you own the domain — and is priced per engagement — request a quote.

Frequently asked questions

Does the TCP flag flood spoof source addresses?

No. Every segment is emitted from the worker's own public address. The TCP control flags are crafted, but the source is never forged.

How is this different from a SYN flood?

A SYN flood pressures the half-open backlog with SYN segments alone. A TCP flag flood sends a mix of control flags — SYN, ACK, RST, and FIN — to exercise stateful firewalls and connection-tracking logic that treats each flag differently.

Related simulations

SYN flood test Sends bounded, unspoofed TCP SYN packets without completing the handshake, pressuring the SYN backlog and testing SYN cookies, connection tracking, and edge mitigation. ACK flood test Sends one steady, isolated out-of-state ACK vector to pressure stateful firewalls and connection tracking, independent of SYN-flood mitigation. PSH-ACK flood test Sends out-of-state PSH-ACK data segments that mimic an established flow, exercising the receive path more heavily than bare headers.

Rehearse a TCP flag flood against infrastructure you own — bounded, monitored, and stopped the instant you have your answer.

Build a test plan
← All DDoS simulations
ddos-simulation.com

Authorized, bounded resilience testing for infrastructure you own.

Product

Simulations Timeline builder Live monitoring Periodic testing Regional distribution White-Label Program

Guides

Controlled Testing Process How Auto-Abort Works AWS DDoS Testing Guide Azure DDoS Testing Guide Google Cloud Armor Guide Cloudflare Testing Guide 140 Attack Techniques

Portal

Sign in Create account Build a test plan

Compliance

EU DORA Compliance NIS2 Directive Compliance PCI DSS v4.0 Testing Testing Legality & RoE

Legal

Terms of Service Acceptable Use Privacy Policy Data Processing Addendum Contact
© 2026 ddos-simulation.com · Authorized testing only. DORA · PCI DSS · Terms · Privacy · Acceptable use · DPA